President Trump’s touting of a proposed partnership with Russia on cyber-safety drew withering critiques Sunday from lawmakers, together with a number of from his personal get together, whereas the president’s aides have been left struggling to reply questions on simply how onerous Trump pressed Russian President Vladimir Putin on Moscow’s meddling in final yr’s U.S. presidential election.

Trump’s encounter with Putin on the sidelines of the Group of 20 financial summit in Hamburg, Germany, Friday was his first assembly as president with the Russian chief. It got here after months of controversy over Russian cyber-meddling and whether or not anybody near Trump’s marketing campaign had colluded in it.

The White Home has sought to painting Trump’s journey to Germany and a stopover beforehand in Poland as a strong success, regardless of a putting diploma of U.S. isolation over local weather change and commerce on the G-20 gathering.

Trump returned Saturday to what guarantees to be a bruising new spherical of battles over the faltering Senate healthcare plan and recent GOP nervousness over whether or not the get together, which controls each homes of Congress, can notch significant legislative achievements by summer time’s finish.

As typically occurs, Trump made the job of White Home underlings harder — this time, with a collection of tweets Sunday morning through which he once more appeared to equivocate on whether or not Russian hacking had taken place. He additionally revived assault strains towards former President Obama and John Podesta, who ran Hillary Clinton’s dropping presidential marketing campaign.

Virtually as quickly because the Trump-Putin talks ended Friday after greater than two hours of discussions, the Russians launched into a public-relations offensive. With the U.S. aspect staying out of digital camera vary, Russia’s Overseas Minister Sergei Lavrov fortunately knowledgeable reporters that Trump had accepted Putin’s denial of interference within the marketing campaign.

Putin strengthened that narrative Saturday, saying that Trump had appeared “glad” together with his protestations of innocence.

The Trump administration introduced its personal nuanced model, by way of Secretary of State Rex Tillerson: that the president had repeatedly raised the difficulty of cyber-meddling with Putin and the 2 sides had agreed it was time to maneuver on to different and extra urgent challenge, together with the persevering with massacre in Syria.

Trump himself weighed in with a collection of tweets Sunday saying he had “strongly pressed” Putin over election interference and that the Russian chief “vehemently denied it.”

White Home officers stated Sunday that Trump didn’t consider Putin’s denials, although neither he nor aides have described him pushing again towards them on the time.

“The president completely didn’t consider the denial of President Putin,” Reince Priebus, Trump’s chief of employees, stated on “Fox Information Sunday.”

Trump in his tweets prevented that time, saying solely, “I’ve already given my opinion.”

As lately as Thursday, Trump expressed doubts about whether or not Russia had interfered within the election, remarking in a information convention in Warsaw that “I feel it might very nicely have been Russia, however I feel it might properly have been different nations.”

“No one actually is aware of for positive,” he stated.

Relatively than repeat these doubts, Trump’s tweets touted his speak with Putin about creating an “impenetrable Cyber Safety unit” to fight abuses like hacking and on-line propaganda.

That prospect that left some main Republicans scarcely capable of include their disbelief.

“It’s not the dumbest concept I’ve ever heard, however it’s fairly shut,” stated Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who referred to as Trump’s talks with Putin “disastrous.” Interviewed on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” the GOP veteran added: “On the subject of Russia, he’s obtained a blind spot.”

Along with the U.S. intelligence evaluation that the Russian chief personally approved the marketing campaign to intrude within the American vote with the purpose of aiding Trump, Moscow stands accused of cyber-meddling in a number of European election campaigns.

Sen. John McCain, a outstanding Russia hawk, was requested on CBS’ “Face the Nation” whether or not Russia was actually possible to offer any assist in combating election interference.

“I’m positive that Vladimir Putin might be of monumental” — the Arizona Republican paused to chortle — “help to that effort, since he’s doing the hacking.” Turning critical, he added: “Sure, it’s time to maneuver ahead, however there needs to be a worth to pay” for an assault on American democracy.

Yet one more Republican senator, Marco Rubio of Florida — who, like Graham, had been an early longing for the GOP presidential nomination — chimed in with extra fox-guarding-the-henhouse imagery. He stated on Twitter that teaming up with Putin to safeguard elections can be like partnering with Syria’s President Bashar Assad, who has carried out repeated strikes towards his personal individuals with banned nerve brokers, in a chemical weapons unit.

Trump surrogates, although, defended the plan as a worthy effort to convey Russia into the fold.

“That is about having the capabilities to be sure that we each battle cyber [interference] collectively, which I feel is a really vital accomplishment for President Trump,” Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin stated on ABC’s “This Week.”

Unsurprisingly, Democratic lawmakers and former Obama administration officers discovered little to reward concerning the proposal.

“We’d as nicely simply mail our poll bins to Moscow,” Rep. Adam Schiff ( D-Burbank) stated on CNN’s “State of the Union.” Schiff, a former prosecutor, is the rating Democrat on the Home Intelligence Committee.

On the identical program, former Protection Secretary Ashton Carter referred to as it a web page from the previous Soviet-period playbook.

“When confronted with one thing fallacious, they ask for U.S. intelligence — previous trick — and suggest a working group, on this case on cyber,” he stated. “However that is just like the man who robbed your home proposing a working group on housebreaking.”

The collection of tweets marked Trump’s first substantive public evaluation of the assembly with Putin. In them, he didn’t contest the Russian assertion that he had accepted Putin’s denials.

Priebus, within the Fox interview, offered little extra in the best way of readability. “He stated they [Russians] in all probability meddled within the election,” the chief of employees informed interviewer Chris Wallace. “However he additionally believes that different nations additionally participated on this exercise.”

Former Director of Nationwide Intelligence James Clapper has stated beforehand that there was no proof that the marketing campaign of interference was directed by anybody aside from the Kremlin.

Because the collusion probe reaches deeper into Trump’s internal circle, U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley was requested on CNN’s “State of the Union” why Trump wouldn’t state, publicly and explicitly, that Russia had meddled within the U.S. election.

“Everyone’s making an attempt to nitpick what he says and what he doesn’t, however speak is one factor — actions are one other,” she stated. “He confronted President Putin; he made it the very first thing that he talked about. And I feel we now have to now see the place it goes from right here.”

Haley additionally advised that Trump is perhaps enjoying a canny lengthy recreation in making an attempt to domesticate a relationship with Putin — though she employed far harder language about Russia than has been heard from the president.

“We will’t belief Russia, and we gained’t ever belief Russia,” she stated. “However you retain people who you don’t belief nearer, so to all the time regulate them and hold them in verify.”

Tillerson, who was visiting Ukraine on Sunday, additionally took a harder line towards Moscow, saying it was the Kremlin’s duty to “de-escalate” the state of affairs within the nation’s japanese sector by eradicating its armaments and exercising management over separatists loyal to Russia.

Till then, he stated at a information convention with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, sanctions would stay in place.

Column: This is how getting older child boomers will change the influence of California’s Proposition thirteen »

Occasions employees author Tracy Wilkinson contributed to this report.

laura.king@latimes.com

@laurakingLAT